New Post
Nash Equilibrium In Game Theory ~xRay Pixy
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Video Link CLICK HERE...
Learn Nash Equilibrium In Game Theory Step-By-Step Using Examples.
Video Chapters: Nash Equilibrium
00:00 Introduction
00:19 Topics Covered
00:33 Nash Equilibrium
01:55 Example 1
02:30 Example 2
04:46 Game Core Elements
06:41 Types of Game Strategies
06:55 Prisoner’s Dilemma
07:17 Prisoner’s Dilemma Example 3
09:16 Dominated Strategy
10:56 Applications
11:34 Conclusion
The Nash Equilibrium is a concept in game theory that describes a situation where no player can benefit by changing their strategy while the other players keep their strategies unchanged.
Prisoner’s Dilemma: Two criminals are arrested and interrogated separately. Each has two options: to confess (cooperate with the police) or remain silent. The Nash Equilibrium occurs when both confess, as neither can improve their outcome by changing their strategy given the other’s choice.
Core Elements of a Game
Players:
- Participants in the game, such as individuals, firms, or countries.
- Identified numerically in an n-player game (e.g., Player i).
- Their decisions collectively influence the outcome.
Strategies:
- Actions or sets of actions available to players.
- Examples:
- In a Cournot game, firms decide production quantities, considering their rivals’ outputs.
Payoffs:
- Rewards or outcomes for players based on their chosen strategies.
- Typically, payoffs are monetary (e.g., profits for firms) but can represent any measurable return.
Benefits of Nash Equilibrium
Predictive Power:
- NE provides a structured way to predict the outcome of strategic interactions.
- It identifies stable outcomes where players have no incentive to deviate.
Versatility:
- Applies to a wide range of fields, from economics and biology to political science and AI.
Strategic Insight:
- Helps decision-makers anticipate the actions of others and adapt strategies accordingly.
Adaptability:
- Extends to mixed strategies, enabling analysis of games without pure strategy equilibria.
Conceptual Simplicity:
- Despite its mathematical rigor, the basic idea is intuitive: "No one gains by changing their strategy alone."
Limitations of Nash Equilibrium
Multiple Equilibria:
- Many games have multiple Nash equilibria, making it hard to predict which one will occur.
- Example: Coordination games like "Bach or Stravinsky?"
Non-Existence in Some Games:
- Pure strategy Nash equilibria may not exist in certain games, though mixed strategies provide a solution.
Assumption of Rationality:
- NE assumes all players are perfectly rational and have complete knowledge of the game.
- In real-life situations, bounded rationality, emotions, or incomplete information can lead to deviations.
Socially Suboptimal Outcomes:
- Nash equilibrium doesn't necessarily lead to the best overall outcome.
- Example: The Prisoner’s Dilemma results in mutual defection, which is worse for both players than mutual cooperation.
Static Nature:
- NE focuses on a single, stable outcome but doesn't explain how players arrive at this equilibrium dynamically.
Complexity in Large Games:
- In games with many players or strategies, finding NE can be computationally difficult or impractical.
Applications of Nash Equilibrium
Economics and Business:
- Pricing Strategies:
- Companies use NE to predict outcomes in competitive pricing (e.g., Cournot or Bertrand models).
Artificial Intelligence:
- Multi-Agent Systems:
- Helps in designing algorithms where autonomous agents interact strategically (e.g., self-driving cars, robotics).
Biology:
- Evolutionary Stability:
- NE is used in evolutionary biology to study strategies that survive over generations (e.g., predator-prey interactions).
- Evolutionary Stability:
#optimization #algorithm #metaheuristic #robotics #deeplearning #ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #computervision #research #projects #thesis #Python
#optimizationproblem #optimizationalgorithms
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment